Total Entries : 32 Now showing entries 32 through 23
Post #
32
Date
10/18/2006 - 9:39 AM
Name
Rd.
Rating:
Comments:
Really interesting twist. Can't remember the ending though? .
Post #
31
Date
12/22/2004 - 10:15 PM
Name
Cs.
Rating:
Comments:
This movie was really good and i think people should see this movie .
Post #
30
Date
9/6/2004 - 6:47 PM
Name
William.
Rating:
Comments:
Bad and boring.
Post #
29
Date
4/6/2004 - 10:55 PM
Name
Jules.
Rating:
Comments:
I feel it was a very lackluster effort from the writers, director and stars. .
Post #
28
Date
3/30/2004 - 3:20 PM
Name
Dan.
Rating:
Comments:
At the beginning of the film, the prosecutor's jury consultant tells dustin hoffman's character "i believe in a world without guns". this is all there is to the film; the gun companies are the bad guys and the anti-gun lawyers are the good guys.
don't waste your time on this flick, unless you want to see what a weak case anti-gun activists actually have for wanting to take away the right for all law-abiding people to carry arms.
.
Post #
27
Date
1/23/2004 - 10:24 PM
Name
Mhmh.
Rating:
Comments:
. .
Post #
26
Date
1/21/2004 - 2:07 PM
Name
Traitorjak.
Rating:
Comments:
As usual, the book is better, but had a good ole time watching gene hackman squirm. Pretty good acting all around. .
Post #
25
Breakdown
Acting
Action
No Rating
Comedy
No Rating
Effects
No Rating
Story
No Rating
Date
12/31/2003 - 12:16 PM
Name
nice thriller.
Rating:
Comments:
Great thriller.
Post #
24
Date
12/4/2003 - 10:39 PM
Name
Banffviewer.
Rating:
Comments:
Solid plot. . Good twists.
gene hackman is at his best. Cusak an co are good, solid. Hoffman delivers the usual good.
very well shot, with good tempo.
story is a bit hard to bring to reality at times (i'm not a conspiracist . . ) but all the typical mit lingo that holliwood uses is a bit too much. . Still it tells the story well. .
Post #
23
Date
12/1/2003 - 4:46 PM
Name
A.
Rating:
Comments:
This movie totally destroyed the classic john grisham book it supposedly was about. the only thing that kept me from up and walking out was john cusack, and maybe the fact that gene hackman and dustin hoffamn are good actors. unfortunately for them their name is now linked with this movie. the plot was unrealistic and pointless. the jury was badly portrayed and added absolutely nothing to the movie. i wouldn't give this movie more than the two hours of my time it took to watch, and the three minutes i'm taking now to warn the rest of you. but hey, feel free to waste your time. .
25%
22%
9%
16%
3%
25%
