Total Entries : 32 Now showing entries 32 through 23
Post #
32
Date
3/14/2005 - 1:28 PM
Name
Cody.
Rating:
Comments:
Worst movie that ive seen in a very long time .
Post #
31
Breakdown
Acting
No Rating
Action
No Rating
Comedy
No Rating
Effects
Story
No Rating
Date
10/1/2003 - 4:01 PM
Name
Brad pitt ii.
Rating:
Comments:
When i saw daredevil i though its the worst film i've ever seen in my life.
but after (they)its not the worst film but its the worst thing happened to me in my life and mu daeth. The worst 85 minutes in my life. .
Post #
30
Date
9/8/2003 - 3:49 PM
Name
Conan.
Rating:
Comments:
Solw at first but it gets better. .
Post #
29
Date
8/8/2003 - 4:47 AM
Name
Superduperguy.
Rating:
Comments:
I would have to agree with corpseporn's earlier posting. The ending was worse than polanski's 9th gate ending! the setup was there for a big payoff and instead it was a,"what the f'". Maybee this movie ended abruptly because further explination of the where and whys' could have made things worse. . .
Post #
28
Date
8/8/2003 - 4:44 AM
Name
Superduperguy.
Rating:
Comments:
I would have to agree with corpseporn's earlier posting. The ending was worse than polanski's 9th gate ending! the setup was there for a big payoff and instead it was a,"what the f'". Maybee this movie ended abruptly because further explination of the where and whys' could have made things worse. .
Post #
27
Date
8/5/2003 - 5:50 AM
Name
Horror fan.
Rating:
Comments:
"they" has premise had potential, but in this case the potential was unexploited. nothing new here. "night terrors" like in "darkness falls"? or like the elm street movies? how original. and what did those creepy little creatures do once they got you? what were "they"? too many loose ends, not enough backround on characters or the monsters.
hf .
Post #
26
Date
7/17/2003 - 10:29 AM
Name
Dorsflando.
Rating:
Comments:
No masterpiece of course, but certainly entertaining; very good camerawork,and decent actors, which is already a plus compared to many similar stories.
Post #
25
Date
7/1/2003 - 6:55 PM
Name
Lady.
Rating:
Comments:
The whole concept of it was overused, stealing it from darkness falls, "stay in the light". i must say the monsters were very cool indeed. the problem is, they hardly showed em'. not only that, but the film had one of the sh*tiest endings i've seen in a long, long time. despite the jumps, there is nothing special here. .
Post #
24
Breakdown
Acting
No Rating
Action
No Rating
Comedy
No Rating
Effects
Story
No Rating
Date
7/1/2003 - 4:36 PM
Name
Corpseporn.
Rating:
Comments:
I didn't mind this movie until that retarded ending. It was g a y. Plus they never told what those stupid monsters are, or showed them. That pissed me off. I had to hit the pause button when one of those stupid things jumped through a window. It looked all dried up and had no eyes. It was entertaining though through a lot of it. Had some cool scenes you thought were gonna build up to a big climax. If you like movies that end and what should be the three quarter mark. Watching this movie right through is like masturbating and stopping right before your finished. It leaves with a bad case of blue balls. .
Post #
23
Breakdown
Acting
No Rating
Action
No Rating
Comedy
No Rating
Effects
Story
No Rating
Date
6/26/2003 - 7:36 AM
Name
Eyes.
Rating:
Comments:
I liked this movie. yes, it was just a variation of other movies that use the same, or similar, topic, but i would be willing to bet that darkness falls, and the other films listed here as the “original” were just variations of even earlier stories written by lovecraft and other authors.
the point of a film is to entertain. i found this film to be very entertaining. the ending that leaves her trapped in the world of “they” was excellent. the film’s alternate ending that shows her as a mental patient is equally well done.
.
23%
10%
13%
19%
6%
29%
